Spokesperson: Edie?
Question: Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary-General. Edith Lederer from the Associated Press. What do you know about resuming talks between the United States and Iran? President [Donald] Trump has just said it could happen, possibly in the next two days. And also, has the United Nations been able to get any humanitarian aid into Iran?
Secretary-General: In relation to the first question, I have to say that I consider it essential that these negotiations go on. I think it would be unrealistic to expect to such a complex problem, long-lasting problem, could be resolved in the first session of a negotiation. So, we need negotiations to go on, and we need a ceasefire to persist as negotiations go on. On the other hand, the CERF (Central Emergency Response Fund) has attributed $12 million to our country team in order to be able to provide effective humanitarian assistance to people in dire need of that assistance.
Question: But you didn't actually address my question, which was: Does the United Nations, do you know about the prospect, the possibility of a resumption of talks?
Secretary-General: The indication we have is that it is highly probable that these talks will restart. I had today a [phone call] with the Deputy Prime Minister of Pakistan, and I want to take profit at this occasion to express my enormous admiration to Pakistan for the very important initiative that Pakistan has been assuming in order to bring peace to the Middle East.
Spokesperson: Biesan?
Question: Thank you, Mr. Secretary-General. Biesan Abu-Kwaik with Al Jazeera Arabic. With direct talks taking place today in Washington between Lebanon and Israel, what are your expectations from these talks? How do you view them playing, if they precede, you know, a role in the bigger picture when it comes to the Iran War? And what would be a UN role, if these talks proceed going forward?
Secretary-General: Well, I believe that nobody expects that these talks today will solve all the problems. But I think it will be very important if these talks create the conditions to a change in the way the actors have been developing their activities. Until now, the truth is that Hezbollah and Israel have always helped each other to destabilize the Government of Lebanon. Whenever Israel occupies part of the territory of Lebanon, that is the pretext that Hezbollah uses to say, “We cannot disarm. We must keep the resistance.” Whenever Hezbollah sends rockets against Israel, even after having promised that they wouldn’t do it, Israel immediately uses that pretext for this massive operation against Lebanon. At the same time, you have the Government of Lebanon that is totally committed on one hand to the territorial integrity of Lebanon, but on the other hand, to have the monopoly of use of force, which implies the disarmament of Hezbollah. So, it's time for Israel and Lebanon to be working together, instead of Lebanon being the victim of this kind of negative -, I would say - negative conjugation of the actions of the Hezbollah and Israel.
Thank you very much.

